We can see from this screen shot of the tool kit that Digital technology approaches are high cost approaches with moderate student progress, which is supported by extensive evidence. Whereas Collaborative learning approaches for instance is low cost that produces the approximately the same student progress. Certainly makes me think.
The infrequent ramblings and musings of a curriculum and education technology consultant.
Thursday, 22 May 2014
Sutton Trust - EEF Teaching and Learning Toolkit
If you are wondering about ways to spend your PDG effectively have a look at the Sutton Trust EEF Teaching and Learning Toolkit. It provides guidance for teachers and schools on how to use their resources to improve the attainment of disadvantaged pupils. You'll find a wide selection of approaches that a school can take, along with the estimated cost, the availability and the quality of evidence, and finally the average impact expected estimated in terms of additional months progress pupils might be expected to make as a result of that approach being taken in the school.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured post
Hwb and School Autonomy
As you can probably tell by the amount of blogs that I'm currently posting, I am currently thinking a lot about the current state of EdT...
Popular Posts
-
In a couple of previous posts I looked at what was meant by the term digital literacy and what this could mean in the Welsh education con...
-
At a time when England have introduced digital literacy elements to their new Computing PoS, and with the recommendations from the ICT Ste...
-
For a while I've been looking for a free piece of mind mapping software for schools, and so got quite excited when I stumbled across Min...

No comments:
Post a Comment